Lisa LaFlamme, CTV News, and Bad Executive Decisions

Previous CTV national anchor
Lisa LaFlamme

There will be no bittersweet on-air goodbye for (now previous) CTV countrywide news anchor Lisa LaFlamme, no ceremonial passing of the baton to the following technology, no broadcast retrospectives lionizing a journalist with a storied and award-profitable vocation. As LaFlamme declared yesterday, CTV’s parent enterprise, Bell Media, has decided to unilaterally stop her agreement. (See also the CBC’s reporting of the story in this article.)

When LaFlamme herself does not make this declare, there was of course speedy speculation that the network’s determination has anything to do with the actuality that LaFlamme is a woman of a sure age. LaFlamme is 58, which by Tv set specifications is not just younger — apart from when you review it to the age at which popular men who proceeded her have left their respective anchor’s chairs: contemplate Peter Mansbridge (who was 69), and Lloyd Robertson (who was 77).

But an even extra sinister theory is now afoot: instead than mere, shallow misogyny, proof has arisen of not just sexism, but sexism conjoined with corporate interference in newscasting. Two evils for the price of one particular! LaFlamme was fired, claims journalist Jesse Brown, “because she pushed again towards one Bell Media executive.” Brown reviews insiders as declaring that Michael Melling, vice president of information at Bell Media, has bumped heads with LaFlamme a amount of occasions, and has a historical past of interfering with information coverage. Brown further more experiences that “Melling has regularly demonstrated a deficiency of regard for ladies in senior roles in the newsroom.”

Useless to say, even if a private grudge additionally sexism reveal what is going on, listed here, it even now will feel to most as a “foolish choice,” one particular sure to result in the business head aches. Now, I make it a policy not to query the organization savvy of experienced executives in industries I really do not know well. And I advise my college students not to leap to the conclusion that “that was a dumb decision” just because it’s a single they really don’t understand. But however, in 2022, it is difficult to envision that the corporation (or Melling additional precisely) didn’t see that there would be blowback in this case. It’s a person factor to have disagreements, but it’s a different to unceremoniously dump a beloved and award-winning girl anchor. And it’s bizarre that a senior government at a information corporation would assume that the truth of the matter would not appear out, provided that, just after all, he’s surrounded by men and women whose career, and own motivation, is to report the information.

And it’s difficult not to suspect that this a a lot less than joyful transition for LaFlamme’s substitution, Omar Sachedina. Of system, I’m certain he’s happy to get the position. But though Bell Media’s press launch quotations Sachedina stating sleek points about LaFlamme, surely he didn’t want to assume the anchor chair amidst widespread criticism of the transition. He’s taking on the job beneath a shadow. Potentially the prize is truly worth the cost, but it is also challenging not to picture that Sachedina experienced (or now has) some pull, some means to influence that way of the transition. I’m not expressing (as some definitely will) that — as an insider who knows the authentic story — he really should have declined the job as ill-gotten gains. But at the extremely minimum, it appears good to argue that he should have utilized his affect to shape the changeover. And if the now-senior anchor does not have that type of influence, we must be concerned in fact about the independence of that function, and of that newsroom.

A final, related take note about authority and governance in sophisticated organizations. In any reasonably effectively-governed corporation, the decision to axe a major, general public-facing expertise like LaFlamme would demand indicator-off — or at least tacit approval — from much more than a person senior govt. This indicates that one particular of two points is accurate. Either Bell Media is not that type of very well-ruled firm, or a substantial amount of individuals ended up concerned in, and culpable of, unceremoniously dumping an award-profitable journalist. Which is even worse?

Leave a Reply